|
Maybe in another universe. Wish I could have dinner with him. dyson is such fun to read. Makes you think about abstract and abstruse things that - maybe we all should be paying attention to - even if they are not possible to solve.
As always, Freeman Dyson's work is challenging and thoughtful. Dyson's interest in the origins and evolution of life emerges clearly in this volume, and this discussion sparked in part by the debates over abortion and creationism is most welcome. He then adds, "On the other hand, nuclear winter is not just a theory. Dyson's discussion of "nuclear winter" is an especially useful object lesson in the nature and conundrums of scientific thought and practice. 258). This is one approach, Dyson concludes, but not the only one and he drew his analogies from the London fog. "Infinite in All Directions," despite some essays that are a bit out of date, is a worthy contribution which all would profit by reading. He offered three possible solutions, one ignoring humanity and seeking to disprove the theory, another embracing humanity and nuclear winter as a theory.
He certainly did. If the atmosphere is filled with wet soot, the temperature on the ground will stay roughly constant as it used to do under a London fog. As he wrote: "So my instinct as a scientist comes into sharp conflict with my instinct as a human being.What does a scientist do when science and humanity pull in opposite directions" (p. It is also a political statement with profound moral implications" (p. "Every new theory has to fight for its existence against intense and often bitter criticism," Dyson comments (p. 262). The severity of a nuclear winter depends on whether the soot-laden atmosphere is predominantly dry or predominantly wet" (p. As he notes: "If the atmosphere after a nuclear war is filled with dry soot, the temperature on the ground will fall and the Earth will experience nuclear winter.
He questioned the theory with some excellent points drawn, as he said, from his background. As always with Freeman Dyson, this book is a provocative exploration of a set of interesting and often unusual themes in nature, thoughtfully related to the larger issues of the day. 259). Moreover, since we live on a water-dominated planet Dyson believes that such a nuclear exchange would not trigger the type of ice age that Sagan advanced. This is both a strength and weakness of this book. Why then do we reach different conclusions." (p.
In "Infinite in All Directions" Dyson searches for meaning on the diversity of the Earth's ecosystem, the inner workings of the universe, and the place of humanity in our larger cosmological structure. He offered this succinct statement of this third approach: "it will not do us any good in the long run to believe a wrong theory, but it will not do us any good in the short run to attack it publicly, so let us keep silent and reserve judgment until the facts become clear" (p. Somewhere in the middle is Dyson's admittedly important perspective and provocative essay on "nuclear winter," a theory advanced by Carl Sagan and others in the 1980s that suggested that a nuclear exchange between the superpowers would trigger a worldwide ice age. Indeed, science may be autobiographical, Dyson writes, for Carl Sagan drew his analogies for "nuclear winter" from his studies of the cold, dry environment of Mars and the dust particles in its thin atmosphere. 259). A third option, one followed by most scientists in the "nuclear winter" debate, was to privately seek to disprove but publicly to support the theory. Presented originally as a set of lectures at Aberdeen, Scotland, in 1985, the chapters of this book have a familiarity and sensitivity to events of the time that one might expect. 260).
Doing so helps to self-correct the state of knowledge, and there is no higher calling in science. Scientific understanding is infinitely more complex, convoluted, interesting, and significant than most believe. In such a situation scientists face a dilemma that cannot be minimized. Apply this issue to the major scientific debates of the present, of which there are many, and it is apparent that there are few easy answers. In all cases, the mode of science is to seek to disprove or at least modify any new theory. Those who hold the mistaken belief that scientific understanding is objective and linear will be well served in reading this case study. This does not mean that Dyson saw no threat to humanity in nuclear weapons.
Dyson, like many others, chose that third option in the "nuclear winter" debate. His concern for cold war issues, especially a lengthy discussion of the place of Austria, seems someone archaic more than twenty years later. They may take their normal approach as scientists and seek to disprove the theory, which Dyson believed in the case of nuclear winter would be successful, but doing so would provide the decision makers with cover for belligerent actions. In fact, he spent considerable space ruminating on the choices that scientists must make in confronting such scientific questions. "We both use the same mathematics and both work with the same laws of physics. 263).
It has been noted that some of the best writing around can be found in the scientific world and this book is a confirmation. The problem with non-political types formulating policy is that over time the perception grows that Barbra Streisand is as knowledgable as Colin Powell or Freeman Dyson knows something that Madelaine Albright doesn't or that Jerry Falwell or Dr. The essays are erudite, entertaining, informative and more than anything (especially in the "universe" section) demonstrate that the nature of science and humanity's involvement in it is complex, sometimes contradictory and at times perplexing. Then the second part falters a bit.
Who created those weapons if not scientists. Ruth or some college professor has the answer to the complex social problems of the day.The peaceful manner in which the potentially explosive end of the Cold War was guided by those familiar with the situation is a rebuke to all the talking heads. What was infuriating was the notion pushed by Dyson that scientists and intellectuals are peculiarly inclined toward peace. He, like many, dreams of a Star Trek world of universal peace, an end to racial and religious strife and a focus on scientific and artistic achievment. Do farmers, steel workers, bankers, programmers and chefs desire a nuclear war. It is divided into two sections that the author describes as reflecting two meanings of the title - the infinite quality of the universe and the infinite responsibility of mankind.
A good essay on "Star Wars" and its meaning and potential was followed by some out of the box speculation on ways of dealing with the Soviet State. It sounds noble but in no way reflects our evolutionary heritage. Life is explored in all its variations - how it started, why it's complex, how it will end, what it means. The author can be forgiven some of his remarks due to the date of publication as he goes on about the (former) Soviet Union, peace, NATO, Star Wars, Nuclear Winter, etc.
He is also a great science writer for the layman. This is a collection of 17 lectures that touch on many subjects, including 6 on biology.
It will change the way you look at the universe around you. Unplug the phone, lock the door--whatever it takes to have some quiet time to yourself--and read this absorbing and thoughtful book.
Mr. When I read Freeman Dyson, I feel as though I am in the presence of supreme, but very kindly intellect.
This book will also introduce the you other fascinating books that you've never heard about but will wish that you had. Dyson is one of the most respected and distinguished physicists in the world.
Although a gentle and gracious man by nature, Dyson is not afraid to take on the sacred cows and unfashionable areas of science, and it is obvious that there is little beyond his powers of comprehension.
|
